VideoVista covers rental and retail titles in all genres and movie or TV categories, with filmmaker interviews, auteur profiles, top 10 lists,
plus regular prize draws.
INDEX OF ALL REVIEWS
SEARCH THIS SITE
TOP 10 LISTS
INTERVIEWS & PROFILES
RETRO REVIEWS SECTION
ABOUT OUR CONTRIBUTORS
SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER
SUPPORT THIS SITE -
SHOP USING THESE LINKS
visit other Pigasus Press sites...
The ZONE - genre nonfiction
Soundchecks - music reviews
Rotary Action - helicopter movies
cast: Jack La Rue, Hugh McDermott, Linden Travers, Walter Crisham, and MacDonald Parke
director: St John Clowe
98 minutes (PG) 1948
Simply Media DVD Region 2
review by Richard Bowden
No Orchids For Miss Blandish
"The most sickening exhibition of brutality, perversion, sex and sadism ever to be shown on a cinema screen." Thus did The Monthly Film Bulletin
judge St John Clowe's film adaptation of No Orchids For Miss Blandish (aka: Black Dice) upon its appearance in 1948, reflecting the
almost universal shock and disapproval of the British critical fraternity. Not until the equally vehement rejection of
Peeping Tom, over a decade later, would a film face such an onslaught.
Audiences, it must be said, found the movie to their liking despite, or because of, the opprobrium and where it was shown, takings were excellent.
Today, passions have cooled somewhat but, while Michael Powell's masterpiece has since been reclaimed by fans and admirers. No Orchids For Miss
Blandish still remains outside looking in at the party, a guilty pleasure to some, an embarrassment of cinema to others. Never to my knowledge
aired on UK TV and only lately granted a DVD release, it's a film which has received some limited reassessment in recent years.
Based on a novel by James Hadley Chase, then in turn made into a theatrical production, No Orchids For Miss Blandish tells the story of a
rich heiress, kidnapped by a small-time mob, only to be captured from them in turn by the much stronger Grisson gang. Slim Grisson is in love with
Miss Blandish and loses interest in the kidnapping as she lingers under his roof. The rich kidnapee in turn falls for the crook, starting a doomed
Meanwhile, a newspaper man turned private investigator manages to crack the case. No less a critic than George Orwell praised the original novel
as "a brilliant piece of writing." The movie attempted to carry over the transatlantic gangster milieu of that book intact, right down to having
the entire cast, American or not, speak with an accent, incorporating 'authentic' settings and idioms into the action and so on - probably the first
film made in England with a purely American setting, as one commentator noted.
Violent and (for it's time) sexually suggestive, lurid and melodramatic, nothing St John Clowe's movie contained pleased critics more happy with
a realistic tradition of filmmaking, or middle-class literary adaptations for discriminating audiences. In retrospect the categorisation of No
Orchids For Miss Blandish seems less problematical. Neither sophisticated literary screen transposition nor completely convincing gangster piece,
laced with titillation, and with roots in trash culture, I'd suggest that the movie is best seen as a landmark of British crime exploitation cinema.
At its heart lays a love story: that between Slim Grisson and Miss Blandish. It's a tragic tale too; not just because of the end which awaits the
couple, but also in that Grisson is shown as being a fervent, secret admirer of the heiress from the very first scene (his distinctive double dice
emblem on the card accompanying flowers) and so, ultimately, is just as much a victim of events as she. His tragedy is that he soon finds himself
overseeing the kidnapping of the woman he loves, while Miss Blandish has the misfortune of falling for someone entirely unsuitable, socially or
But without the sexual experience he brings she would, it seems, be condemned to eternal frigidity. It is no accident that, early on, her fianc�
refers to the "ice in her veins" which needs 'melting'. Indeed one of the many things critics found unacceptable in the movie was the depiction
of a woman's sexual awakening, particularly when tied to a liaison out of her class - something miles away from the usual Noel Coward-type drawing
room infatuation. It's a scenario helped by some sensitive direction by St John Clowe, in a work characterised over all by some fluid camerawork.
Some have criticised the director for clumsiness, but I can't see it. To give a standout example: although we know Grisson is 'stuck' on the heiress,
nothing is said between them, except for a barely perceptible nod at her by the hoodlum after their first shock meeting. At a crucial moment later
St John Clowe has Grisson, clearly thinking of the woman, walk slowly up his nightclub stairs, a fairly long crane shot. His impassive face is briefly
superimposed onto hers. Then in the love scene which follows she leaves him, wavers, and comes back after a tense delay - events mostly off-screen.
We still do not see them together, merely (for the second time) some orchids, and his words of relief spoken over the held flower shot. For a film
so explicit elsewhere, the restraint and sensitivity of direction here is striking.
As Slim Grisson, Jack La Rue is impressive; more so when one remembers that it is almost half an hour before he is first seen on screen at all. A
performance over-indebted to George Raft maybe - his habitual dice throwing recalling the American star's famous coin-tossing trademark - but still
touching as a love-lorn thug and whose regular lack of expression and stolid soulfulness says more than any amount of mugging could do. As Miss
Blandish, Linden Travers has attracted good words, too.
Others in the cast, even allowing for the variable American accents, are admittedly less strong. Ma Grisson (Lilli Molnar), who starts out, Ma
Barker-fashion, as the leader of the gang, is less menacing that one might have wished; 'Doc' the Sydney Greenstreet-type among the supporting
cast is too much of a stereotype to be convincing. However, mention ought to be made of Walter Crisham's Eddie, Grisson's frightening henchman,
a very intimidating and malevolent presence. While some aspects of No Orchids For Miss Blandish have been ridiculed, the budget was obviously
quite a reasonable one; the nightclub fairly expansive and convincing for instance, allowing the director a chance for multiple set-ups.
Of course the club, Grisson, and his followers are a world away from Miss Blandish's previous social circle. In a way characteristic of British
noir and thrillers, the film has a firm idea of class; not only in the separation of crooks and toffs, but upstairs and downstairs (the working
class lovers overhearing the conversation of their betters from the basement, at the start), as well. Even the underworld has its social structure,
one which the 'success' of the Grisson gang is contrasted to the smaller group doing the initial kidnapping. Only love, it seems, can cross these
boundaries, but then such romance is fraught with risk. For Miss Blandish, her new relationship brings 'freedom', this from the "first man I've ever
met" - a slight emphasis on 'man' when she speaks implying the anaemia of the class she has just rejected.
Freed from the documentary-style and improving moral rhetoric of much contemporary British cinema product, fore-fronting violence, female sexual
fulfilment, and apeing a lowbrow American genre to distracting effect, No Orchids For Miss Blandish quickly became a byword for all that
was wrong with cinema, with no chance of any artistic recognition (as quipped future PM Harold Wilson: "No Oscars for Miss Blandish!"). Today,
when shown at all, it still receives a degree of scorn - especially from Americans principally unable to get past the accent issue, or who prefer
the remake (The Grissom Gang, 1968), by Robert Aldrich.
Across the Atlantic, though, it has least received the better DVD release, including a couple of supporting interviews and improved picture quality.
In the UK, it's the typical bare bones edition for those wishing to seek it out, one which cheerily quotes one of the notorious negative reviews
on the back by way of recommendation. To those who wish to discover what all the fuss was about, I can say that the film may be variable, but
entertaining and memorable. It's certainly an important document of Britain's cinematic underbelly. No plaudits for Miss Blandish perhaps, but
no outright dismissal here either.