-MONTHLY VHS & DVD REVIEW-
Join our email list for chat about movies
- send a blank message to CineMania
|
|
|
|
|
copyright © 2001 - 2004 VideoVista
|
|
|
|
No End
cast: Grazyna Szapolowska, Kerzy Radziwilowicz, Maria Pakulnis, Aleksander Bardini, and Jerzy
Radziwilowicz
director: Krzysztof Kieslowski
109 minutes (15) 1985
widescreen ratio 16:9
Artificial Eye DVD Region 2 retail
RATING:
5/10
reviewed by Paul Higson
|
|
|
Daunting and difficult, No End (aka: Bez Konca) compresses the political
and the personal together in an ultimately depressing vision of Perestroika age concatenations.
Grazyna Szapolowska plays newly widowed mother-of-one Urszula Zyro and the circumstances
surrounding her widowhood are explained by the ghost of the husband (Jerzy Radziwilowicz)
himself, perched on the end of their marital bed as she sleeps. Antek is dead from a heart
attack in the driver's seat of the family car, as he was parked, waiting for them to come
down from the apartment so he could deliver them to school. A lawyer, he was young and
relatively courageous, taking cases that might oppose the current regime if too lenient a
result is brought about for the client. But don't get too carried away with the ghost, he is
stoical presence wandering in and out of the proceedings, nudging things into place, leaving
evidence and warnings elsewhere. His presence is felt by the grieving wife, her sorrow that of
a young widow in a miserable landscape, a translator who has to complete her current assignment
of a George Orwell novel.
There is little respite from the misery. Even the friend of the family who
always had a yen for her does not give her too many opportunities to fall unto his direction
before declaring his departure for Canada. Possible salvation would appear to come in one of
her husband's cases, the visit by the wife (and, importantly, the only child, a juxtaposition
on the recent make up of her own household) of a man accused of organising a strike action.
With the threat of several years of imprisonment hanging over him and foreseeing the heartbreak
that it would bring his loved ones, she is stirred into relative motivation. At first it is
merely making a referral, from that she becomes more and more involved.
Urszula is confused by clues of her dead husband's continuing loiter,
suspecting him of stalling her car on a road in order to let the next speeding vehicle pass
her by and take the fatal crash into a bus. Is the ghost interfering and so mistaken for doing
so? Can the dead make mistakes? (Why not?) And that is an intriguing concept. One despondently
asks if in death Kieslowski's spirits lose their lustre, retard, become less effective beyond
their obvious limitation in communication, dilapidating as if in some ghostly version of a
debilitating mental illness. Saving one from a fatal car crash, allowing two to die? Where
ghosts are normally employed in a film narrative to promote the positive, principally a life
after death, Kieslowski finds darkly irresistible the notion of the ineptitude, even the
selfishness, of the dead.
The negativity courses throughout. The result of the trial is a betrayal
of hope, the last case by a septuagenarian coward who returns the husband to his family but
at what personal value of face for the man and at what national cost. The observer is
constantly pushed back. Any hope in the earlier details of the film is gradually whittled
away. Not that the ending is as doom-laden has most see it to be, it is too ridiculous by
that point to remain so bleak. A suicide is played off against the miserable wandering
spiritual afterlife, a re-coupling in the gauzy meadows in heaven better than the parallel
drudgery of couple in their trial of a separation, if you will pardon my play.
Kieslowski would in 1991 produce a more dreamlike and mysterious film in
the magic realist The Double Life Of Veronique, more successful for reasons perhaps
more trite; the rare theme of bi-location (played elsewhere only as a horror motif), the
beauty of Irene Jacob and the new comfort and self-satisfaction felt in the director through
the film. In No End the fantasy is a clumsy device and ghosts with a corporeal form
are a pet hate of mine. The first viewing is doubtless also the muggiest for most, with the
high probability of disinterest at the political level, it is brave for Kieslowski to toy
with and play reluctance and dispiritedness into the proceedings, but it doesn't half eat
away at you to reach a certain point in the film and realise that every aspect is in designer
retreat. Neither does it bode well for successive viewings.
The film is at its most interesting in the earlier stages, most successful
in the details of the grieving process, Urszula's catching up with the real pain and misery,
the realisation of how truly hurt she is, the search for minor sensations in his personal
effects and the discovery of things that a further 30 years of marriage might have had time
to reveal between them in shared marital confession. A jolly disembodied voice on the other
end of the telephone is stilled by the announcement of the death. It is in these 'smallnesses'
that the film is most intriguing. When Marta, a female legal beagle met at a Christmas
gathering, refers to her past student days with Antek, you wonder in two directions. One is
of more secrets withheld for a rainy day, the other is the conspiratorial, a plot to dissuade
Urszula from her support for the case. It is almost certainly the former, but No End
is less convoluted in its actual plot than it is with the potential of meaning. Most scenes
have an option on their explanation. There is still no saying how many viewings if would take
to clear it up, if ever, though it is possible to watch it once decisively, and I wish I were
one of those people, because I don't look forward to seeing this film again.
Poland is dreary but had every right to be, the world still owes the
country greatly for its unlikely geographical location and for its sacrifices, cornered
by the Nazis and the communists, deserted by everyone else repeatedly, seemingly ad infinitum.
Rooms are miserable, residential and office. The Zyro family are in more pleasant living
conditions, clearly on an upwardly mobile path, but already, of course, a trajectory curtailed
by the time we meet them. Smiles become ghosts of the future as on the face of the child and
mother in the courtroom, or an acceptance that things could be worse. None of the characters
are aware of better times around the corner, improvements on the way that merely make the
content of the film, set three or four years earlier all the more dispossessing.
Artificial Eye release this DVD with additional features that include
Kieslowski's early student short The Office (aka: UrZad, 1966), only five
and a half minutes long, an edit-up of visitors to a benefits' office, the casually informative
young female benefits' officer and the far from ignorant clients. The records are seen as a
steadily running frond of loose leaf, filling shelves in the back of the office. Great,
disturbing and humorous play is made on the line: "State what you have done in your
lifetime," barked over the baffled face of an elderly woman.
Grazyna Szapolowska is interviewed. It runs six minutes and she clearly
had less of an understanding of her director than most, contradicts, does not appear
particularly interested in the film and has a low regard of it. Far more interesting is
a 27-minute interview with Jacek Petrycki, a regular contributor to the films of Keislowski,
a great cinematographer and friend. Though No End is spoken of perhaps the greater
understanding of the feature film under review comes from the pre-history and the oppression
that was so difficultly fought against and too often necessarily conceded to. The interviews
take place in spare, bright locations. A fantastic winter knocking on the window, the fond
smile and appreciated familiarity of the Petrycki interview bring it to a more positive
conclusion. Leave the disc at this point with Petrycki describing a man we might all have
liked to have known, a man whose later work rose out of the hubris and up though the positive
spiritual rescue of Poland, a man talented, "loyal, precise and devoted."
|
|