-MONTHLY FILM & TV REVIEW-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Streamers
cast: Matthew Modine, Mitchell Litchenstein, Michael Wright, Guy Boyd, and David Alan Grier
director: Robert Altman
113 minutes (12) 1983
widescreen ratio 2.35:1
Metrodome DVD Region 2 retail
RATING:
6/10
reviewed by James A. Stewart
|
|
|
The early 1980s were boom-time for Vietnam films; there was Full Metal Jacket, Platoon,
Rambo (well, its ridiculous
sequels), and the likes. During this period of celluloid introspection, America was asking itself some
tough questions and thankfully these films tended not to present a romanticised notion of what was a
bloody and brutal war; and for America, what should have been a major learning point. Streamers
is a worthwhile addition to this genre of film.
The story majors on four young boys, not men, in their army barracks. They are awaiting the call to
head overseas and into the Vietnamese jungles. Unlike some of its predecessors mentioned above, Streamers
is set against the backdrop of the Vietnam War, not actually at the frontline. This is borne out of
the film's conversion from play to big screen no doubt. Director Robert Altman
(Gosford Park,
Short Cuts) does well to maintain the intensity of the threat of active combat with the
complex character differentials.
The film is essential a character study of each of the four privates over a 'free' weekend in
their barracks. These soldiers, thrown together in a senseless conflict on the other side of
the world, need to learn to trust and accept each other. However, in a country where the gay
community are still years from acceptance, the overt camp-ness of Richie (Mitchell Litchenstein)
causes angst, and his story is just part of the wider debate around bigotry and censorship in
1960s' America. The US Army's head-in-the-sand attitude toward homosexuality is to fore and the
characters' differing attitudes towards this makes for fascinating viewing.
There are no drill sergeants barking out impossible orders and bullying dumbstruck teenagers
into submission. This is a film concerned with the psychological development of characters
inadvertently linked together by extenuating circumstances and is delivered in a very serious
way. Whilst the lack of action may deter some of the more bloodthirsty aficionados of the genre,
this is a worthy entry into the now deceased Altman's canon and the wider Vietnam pantheon: and
it is a film that does deliver a message, without too much hyperbole, for which Altman's early
work can sometimes be accused of. Some may argue that the underlying story is about social issues
in 1960s' America and not the war, which is true in many ways, however, Vietnam was a catalyst
for much of this debate and to say that the war is not entirely relevant to the story is like
suggesting it's bullets and not guns that kill people: they need each other.
|
|